SCU Unhoused Initiative

Congratulations ’24-’25 Faculty Grantees

Prof. Michael Kevane
Prof. Dosun Ko
Prof. Naomi Levy

The Unhoused Initiative is excited to announce our 2024-2025 Faculty Research Grant awardees. This year, we selected five projects- four original proposals and one UI-developed proposal in partnership with the Santa Clara Police Department. Despite the severity of the crisis in the Silicon Valley, there is a lack of research related to local homelessness. Through faculty research grants, we hope to bridge this gap to inform local policy and programs. Continue reading below for more information about this year’s selected grantees and their projects.

Prof. Tim Urdan
Prof. Bill Sundstrom
Prof. Micah Lattanner

Dosun Ko, Assistant Professor in Santa Clara’s School of Education & Counseling Psychology will address how the intersections of race, disability status, and homelessness contribute to disparities in school discipline, absenteeism, and juvenile justice involvement, with particular attention to marginalized student populations. The study will employ Quantitative Critical Race Theory to explore the systemic inequities that affect students of color with disabilities who also experience housing instability. Professor Ko will collaborate with local organizations, such serving these student populations to co-develop policy recommendations that will inform local educational interventions.

Micah Lattanner, Assistant Professor in Public Health, seeks to assess the impact of Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) on health outcomes and identify predictors of PSH retention—providing valuable insight into “for whom” and “under what conditions” PSH is most effective in enhancing health and continued residence in PSH. The study, titled Who Stays in? A Longitudinal Study of Individual and Social Factors Predicting Long-Term Retention in Permanent Supportive Housing and Health Outcomes, utilizes data from Santa Clara County’s Valley Homeless Healthcare Program and is in partnership with Santa Clara County’s Behavioral Health Department, as well as Unhoused Initiative affiliate faculty, Dr. Jamie Chang.

Naomi Levy, Professor of Political Science, will focus on the impacts of local organizations that serve people experiencing homelessness. Her project will employ the Firsthand Framework for Policy Innovation’s structured research process to generate “bottom up” indicators of program impact of three homeless service organizations. The study’s findings will be used to evaluate programming and inform funding decisions to maximize impact beyond traditional outcome measures. Professor Levy will use her grant funds to support SCU student researchers working on the project.

Bill Sundstrom & Michael Kevane, both professors of Economics in SCU’s Leavey School of Business, will dedicate their Winter and Spring 2025 Santa Clara Urban Issues Research Lab (SCUIRL) courses to an Unhoused Initiative developed project in partnership with the Santa Clara Police Department (SCPD). The project, titled Data Wrangling, Visualization, and Analysis of Data Provided by Santa Clara Police Department on Calls and Police Responses Related to Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) Sites, will evaluate SCPD data related to calls for service at PSH sites to identify patterns and trends. The data analysis will be utilized to inform recommendations for allocation of services and resources. The study will also provide Professor Sundstrom and Kevane’s students with training in spatial data analysis and community-partnered projects.

Tim Urdan, Professor of Psychology, will study the what local schools, government agencies and community organizations are doing to support the academic success or unhoused students. He will also interview the parents/guardians of unhoused students to obtain their insights about how well their students’ needs are being met and what more they believe could be done to better support their children. Professor Urdan will use the resulting data and analyses to create recommendations for how local schools, organizations and agencies can better meet the needs of unhoused students.

SCU Unhoused Initiative

Honoring Our Unhoused Neighbors

On November 18 and 19, the Unhoused Initiative hosted an outdoor art display of the Tombstone Memorial for our unhoused neighbors who died on the street in Santa Clara County this year. Each year, local activist, Shaunn Cartwright, makes a tombstone for each person who died while homeless in the County. A representative sample of the current 195 deaths this year (as of Nov. 18, 2024) were on the Kenna/Benson lawn to raise awareness on campus about homelessness and homeless mortality. It was also an opportunity to acknowledge the 10th anniversary of the sweep of The Jungle in San Jose – one of the largest encampments in the country at the time.

A noontime panel complemented the tombstone display. The panel discussed homeless mortality and the health and safety impacts of encampment sweeps. It was also a reflection on the sweep of the Jungle in 2014 and the community that resided there. Panelists included Shaunn Cartwright, creator of the Tombstone Memorial project, Robert Aguirre, member of the Gilroy Homeless Union, Todd Langton, Executive Director of Agape Silicon Valley, and Unhoused Initiative faculty member, Professor Boo Riley. The panel was the first in a year-long series examining encampment sweeps, past, present and future.

Click here for more information about the Tombstone Memorial, the Jungle, and our panelists.

SCU Unhoused Initiative

Amicus Brief filed in Grants Pass v. Johnson

Unhoused Initiative founding member and affiliated faculty, Jamie Chang, PhD, recently contributed to an Amicus Brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in the upcoming Grants Pass v. Johnson case. The Brief is filed in support of Gloria Johnson and explains the harms of anti-homeless laws on people experiencing homelessness and on their ability to return to housing. It also argues the ineffectiveness of anti-homeless laws as they do not reduce homelessness, and that municipalities are not left without other options to address the homelessness crisis.

The case will examine whether a municipality can criminalize sleeping in public when alternate shelter is not available. The case could have major impacts on the criminalization of homelessness in the United States.

Arguments in the case will take place on April 22nd. The Unhoused Initiative is hosting a panel discussion on the case the week prior, April 16th, at Noon. You can find more information about and register for the event here.

Dr. Chang’s brief is available for viewing in the Articles & Research folder of the Unhoused Initiative’s Online Resource Bank.

SCU Unhoused Initiative

Challenge to Martin v. Boise heads to the Supreme Court

Since the 2018 Ninth Circuit decision in Martin v. Boise, west coast cities have been barred from prohibiting sleeping in public spaces when adequate shelter is not available for their unhoused residents. The Court found that criminalizing camping on public property is cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the 8th Amendment, when there is nowhere for the people in question to legally sleep. Earlier in January, the Supreme Court of the United States agreed to hear City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Gloria Johnson, et. al. and is expected to provide opinion on whether cities can legally ban or limit camping in public spaces by people experiencing homelessness.

According to a recent CalMatters article, The Boise decision has frustrated lawmakers who claim the ruling prevents them from limiting the spread of encampments and from conducting sweeps they say are necessary for health and safety. Advocates for the unhoused, on the other hand, argue that legislators are overreacting and that the Boise case does not prevent them from regulating encampments. Advocates also feel that the Boise decision is clear and municipalities cannot ban sleeping outside when adequate shelter does not exist for people experiencing homelessness.

As reported by CalMatters, since the Boise decision, subsequent court decisions have resulted in “a patchwork of interpretation across [California] on what qualifies as the ‘adequate shelter’ cities must provide before sweeping homeless camps.” The Grants Pass case could provide some clarity on this issue as well as other questions about the limits of Boise. For example, can cities impose time or location restrictions on sleeping outside; whether a City must have adequate shelter available for every unhoused person no matter what or only on days of a sweep; and, whether cities can criminalize sleeping in public spaces for those who refuse to accept the shelter offered to them.

As quoted in CalMatters, Berkeley law professor Jeffrey Selbin predicts that the Supreme Court will not try to “micromanage” the situation. Instead, he predicts the conservative majority Court will overturn the 2018 Boise decision, thereby permitting cities to widely criminalize encampments.

The Unhoused Initiative will be monitoring this case as it progresses at the Supreme Court and will report any updates as they are released.

SCU Unhoused Initiative

The Unhoused Initiative’s David DeCosse publishes opinion piece for the National Catholic Reporter.

David DeCosse

Unhoused Initiative faculty, David DeCosse, published an opinion piece titled “Homelessness crisis shows our country needs a new national story” in the January 2, 2024 edition of the National Catholic Reporter. The article reflects upon the prayer of St. Vincent DePaul – “It is only for your love that the poor will forgive you the bread that you give them” – and its significance in our collective response to the homelessness crisis.

Examining data and stories from the recent California Statewide Study of People Experiencing Homelessness, the piece introduces readers to the realities of California’s homelessness crisis, and follows the prompt of Matthew Desmond’s recent article by challenging us to ask “Who benefits?” from the status quo of housing and homelessness in California. Rather than asking questions of why people experiencing homelessness don’t do something to change their station, we should ask ourselves who benefits from zoning laws or tax breaks that benefit single family homes and limit our supply of available affordable housing.

DeCosse suggests that we rewrite the stories that we tell ourselves to explain the homelessness crisis. Instead of stories of triumph despite adversity and looking for others to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, “we need a new story,” says DeCosse, “in which we are bound in love and justice to the tens of thousands of persons living and dying on our streets.”
Read the full article here.